increase() and rate() don't seem to assume a previous value of 0 when a vector
gets a first value for a label. you would think that an increase() on a
first-value mox_panic_total{"..."}=1 would return 1, and similar for rate(), but
that doesn't appear to be the behaviour. so we just explicitly initialize the
count to 0 for each possible label value. mox has more vector metrics, but
panics feels like the most important, and it's too much code to initialize them
all, for all combinations of label values. there is probably a better way that
fixes this for all cases...
the default transport is still just "direct delivery", where we connect to the
destination domain's MX servers.
other transports are:
- regular smtp without authentication, this is relaying to a smarthost.
- submission with authentication, e.g. to a third party email sending service.
- direct delivery, but with with connections going through a socks proxy. this
can be helpful if your ip is blocked, you need to get email out, and you have
another IP that isn't blocked.
keep in mind that for all of the above, appropriate SPF/DKIM settings have to
be configured. the "dnscheck" for a domain does a check for any SOCKS IP in the
SPF record. SPF for smtp/submission (ranges? includes?) and any DKIM
requirements cannot really be checked.
which transport is used can be configured through routes. routes can be set on
an account, a domain, or globally. the routes are evaluated in that order, with
the first match selecting the transport. these routes are evaluated for each
delivery attempt. common selection criteria are recipient domain and sender
domain, but also which delivery attempt this is. you could configured mox to
attempt sending through a 3rd party from the 4th attempt onwards.
routes and transports are optional. if no route matches, or an empty/zero
transport is selected, normal direct delivery is done.
we could already "submit" emails with 3rd party accounts with "sendmail". but
we now support more SASL authentication mechanisms with SMTP (not only PLAIN,
but also SCRAM-SHA-256, SCRAM-SHA-1 and CRAM-MD5), which sendmail now also
supports. sendmail will use the most secure mechanism supported by the server,
or the explicitly configured mechanism.
for issue #36 by dmikushin. also based on earlier discussion on hackernews.
i wondered why self-signed mtasts certs didn't result in delivery failure. it's
because it was a first-time request of the mtasts policy (clean test
container). and for that case it means mtasts should be ignored.
e.g. when outlook.com puts your IP on a blocklist, it will respond with 550 to
MAIL FROM, then closes the connection (without responding to the remaining
commands). we were reading the 550 response, not yet acting on it, then reading
the response to RCPT TO. that read failed, and we would return that error. now,
we will properly return the 550 (permanent error, instead of the temporary read
error) from the first MAIL FROM (but we do still always try to read the
response for RCPT TO and DATA).
if you start delivering, openbsd's spamd will not announce 8bitmime support.
but once you get patched through to the actual mail server, it will likely
announce 8bitmime support.
perhaps we should also just attempt to deliver 8bit email without 8bitmime
extension. probably better for users than not even trying to send the message.
perhaps in a non-strict mode.
named "traceauth" and "tracedata".
with this, you can (almost) enable trace logging without fear of logging
sensitive data or ddos'ing your log server.
the caveat is that the imap login command has already printed the line as
regular trace before we can decide it should not be. can be fixed soon.
