mirror of
https://github.com/mjl-/mox.git
synced 2024-12-26 16:33:47 +03:00
893a6f8911
we were already accepting, processing and displaying incoming tls reports. now we start tracking TLS connection and security-policy-related errors for outgoing message deliveries as well. we send reports once a day, to the reporting addresses specified in TLSRPT records (rua) of a policy domain. these reports are about MTA-STS policies and/or DANE policies, and about STARTTLS-related failures. sending reports is enabled by default, but can be disabled through setting NoOutgoingTLSReports in mox.conf. only at the end of the implementation process came the realization that the TLSRPT policy domain for DANE (MX) hosts are separate from the TLSRPT policy for the recipient domain, and that MTA-STS and DANE TLS/policy results are typically delivered in separate reports. so MX hosts need their own TLSRPT policies. config for the per-host TLSRPT policy should be added to mox.conf for existing installs, in field HostTLSRPT. it is automatically configured by quickstart for new installs. with a HostTLSRPT config, the "dns records" and "dns check" admin pages now suggest the per-host TLSRPT record. by creating that record, you're requesting TLS reports about your MX host. gathering all the TLS/policy results is somewhat tricky. the tentacles go throughout the code. the positive result is that the TLS/policy-related code had to be cleaned up a bit. for example, the smtpclient TLS modes now reflect reality better, with independent settings about whether PKIX and/or DANE verification has to be done, and/or whether verification errors have to be ignored (e.g. for tls-required: no header). also, cached mtasts policies of mode "none" are now cleaned up once the MTA-STS DNS record goes away.
413 lines
16 KiB
Go
413 lines
16 KiB
Go
package smtpserver
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"net"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/bstore"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dkim"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dmarc"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dmarcrpt"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dns"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dnsbl"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/iprev"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/mlog"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/mox-"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/smtp"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/store"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/subjectpass"
|
|
"github.com/mjl-/mox/tlsrpt"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type delivery struct {
|
|
m *store.Message
|
|
dataFile *os.File
|
|
rcptAcc rcptAccount
|
|
acc *store.Account
|
|
msgFrom smtp.Address
|
|
dnsBLs []dns.Domain
|
|
dmarcUse bool
|
|
dmarcResult dmarc.Result
|
|
dkimResults []dkim.Result
|
|
iprevStatus iprev.Status
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type analysis struct {
|
|
accept bool
|
|
mailbox string
|
|
code int
|
|
secode string
|
|
userError bool
|
|
errmsg string
|
|
err error // For our own logging, not sent to remote.
|
|
dmarcReport *dmarcrpt.Feedback // Validated DMARC aggregate report, not yet stored.
|
|
tlsReport *tlsrpt.Report // Validated TLS report, not yet stored.
|
|
reason string // If non-empty, reason for this decision. Can be one of reputationMethod and a few other tokens.
|
|
dmarcOverrideReason string // If set, one of dmarcrpt.PolicyOverride
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
reasonListAllow = "list-allow"
|
|
reasonDMARCPolicy = "dmarc-policy"
|
|
reasonReputationError = "reputation-error"
|
|
reasonReporting = "reporting"
|
|
reasonSPFPolicy = "spf-policy"
|
|
reasonJunkClassifyError = "junk-classify-error"
|
|
reasonJunkFilterError = "junk-filter-error"
|
|
reasonGiveSubjectpass = "give-subjectpass"
|
|
reasonNoBadSignals = "no-bad-signals"
|
|
reasonJunkContent = "junk-content"
|
|
reasonJunkContentStrict = "junk-content-strict"
|
|
reasonDNSBlocklisted = "dns-blocklisted"
|
|
reasonSubjectpass = "subjectpass"
|
|
reasonSubjectpassError = "subjectpass-error"
|
|
reasonIPrev = "iprev" // No or mild junk reputation signals, and bad iprev.
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func isListDomain(d delivery, ld dns.Domain) bool {
|
|
if d.m.MailFromValidated && ld.Name() == d.m.MailFromDomain {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
for _, r := range d.dkimResults {
|
|
if r.Status == dkim.StatusPass && r.Sig.Domain == ld {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delivery) analysis {
|
|
mailbox := d.rcptAcc.destination.Mailbox
|
|
if mailbox == "" {
|
|
mailbox = "Inbox"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If destination mailbox has a mailing list domain (for SPF/DKIM) configured,
|
|
// check it for a pass.
|
|
rs := store.MessageRuleset(log, d.rcptAcc.destination, d.m, d.m.MsgPrefix, d.dataFile)
|
|
if rs != nil {
|
|
mailbox = rs.Mailbox
|
|
}
|
|
if rs != nil && !rs.ListAllowDNSDomain.IsZero() {
|
|
// todo: on temporary failures, reject temporarily?
|
|
if isListDomain(d, rs.ListAllowDNSDomain) {
|
|
d.m.IsMailingList = true
|
|
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonListAllow, dmarcOverrideReason: string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideMailingList)}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var dmarcOverrideReason string
|
|
|
|
// For forwarded messages, we have different junk analysis. We don't reject for
|
|
// failing DMARC, and we clear fields that could implicate the forwarding mail
|
|
// server during future classifications on incoming messages (the forwarding mail
|
|
// server isn't responsible for the message).
|
|
if rs != nil && rs.IsForward {
|
|
d.dmarcUse = false
|
|
d.m.IsForward = true
|
|
d.m.RemoteIPMasked1 = ""
|
|
d.m.RemoteIPMasked2 = ""
|
|
d.m.RemoteIPMasked3 = ""
|
|
d.m.OrigEHLODomain = d.m.EHLODomain
|
|
d.m.EHLODomain = ""
|
|
d.m.MailFromDomain = "" // Still available in MailFrom.
|
|
d.m.OrigDKIMDomains = d.m.DKIMDomains
|
|
dkimdoms := []string{}
|
|
for _, dom := range d.m.DKIMDomains {
|
|
if dom != rs.VerifiedDNSDomain.Name() {
|
|
dkimdoms = append(dkimdoms, dom)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
d.m.DKIMDomains = dkimdoms
|
|
dmarcOverrideReason = string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideForwarded)
|
|
log.Info("forwarded message, clearing identifying signals of forwarding mail server")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assignMailbox := func(tx *bstore.Tx) error {
|
|
// Set message MailboxID to which mail will be delivered. Reputation is
|
|
// per-mailbox. If referenced mailbox is not found (e.g. does not yet exist), we
|
|
// can still determine a reputation because we also base it on outgoing
|
|
// messages and those are account-global.
|
|
mb, err := d.acc.MailboxFind(tx, mailbox)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("finding destination mailbox: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if mb != nil {
|
|
// We want to deliver to mb.ID, but this message may be rejected and sent to the
|
|
// Rejects mailbox instead, with MailboxID overwritten. Record the ID in
|
|
// MailboxDestinedID too. If the message is later moved out of the Rejects mailbox,
|
|
// we'll adjust the MailboxOrigID so it gets taken into account during reputation
|
|
// calculating in future deliveries. If we end up delivering to the intended
|
|
// mailbox (i.e. not rejecting), MailboxDestinedID is cleared during delivery so we
|
|
// don't store it unnecessarily.
|
|
d.m.MailboxID = mb.ID
|
|
d.m.MailboxDestinedID = mb.ID
|
|
} else {
|
|
log.Debug("mailbox not found in database", mlog.Field("mailbox", mailbox))
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reject := func(code int, secode string, errmsg string, err error, reason string) analysis {
|
|
// We may have set MailboxDestinedID below already while we had a transaction. If
|
|
// not, do it now. This makes it possible to use the per-mailbox reputation when a
|
|
// user moves the message out of the Rejects mailbox to the intended mailbox
|
|
// (typically Inbox).
|
|
if d.m.MailboxDestinedID == 0 {
|
|
var mberr error
|
|
d.acc.WithRLock(func() {
|
|
mberr = d.acc.DB.Read(ctx, func(tx *bstore.Tx) error {
|
|
return assignMailbox(tx)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
if mberr != nil {
|
|
return analysis{false, mailbox, smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, false, "error processing", err, nil, nil, reasonReputationError, dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
d.m.MailboxID = 0 // We plan to reject, no need to set intended MailboxID.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
accept := false
|
|
if rs != nil && rs.AcceptRejectsToMailbox != "" {
|
|
accept = true
|
|
mailbox = rs.AcceptRejectsToMailbox
|
|
d.m.IsReject = true
|
|
// Don't draw attention, but don't go so far as to mark as junk.
|
|
d.m.Seen = true
|
|
log.Info("accepting reject to configured mailbox due to ruleset")
|
|
}
|
|
return analysis{accept, mailbox, code, secode, err == nil, errmsg, err, nil, nil, reason, dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if d.dmarcUse && d.dmarcResult.Reject {
|
|
return reject(smtp.C550MailboxUnavail, smtp.SePol7MultiAuthFails26, "rejecting per dmarc policy", nil, reasonDMARCPolicy)
|
|
}
|
|
// todo: should we also reject messages that have a dmarc pass but an spf record "v=spf1 -all"? suggested by m3aawg best practices.
|
|
|
|
// If destination is the DMARC reporting mailbox, do additional checks and keep
|
|
// track of the report. We'll check reputation, defaulting to accept.
|
|
var dmarcReport *dmarcrpt.Feedback
|
|
if d.rcptAcc.destination.DMARCReports {
|
|
// Messages with DMARC aggregate reports must have a DMARC pass. ../rfc/7489:1866
|
|
if d.dmarcResult.Status != dmarc.StatusPass {
|
|
log.Info("received dmarc aggregate report without dmarc pass, not processing as dmarc report")
|
|
} else if report, err := dmarcrpt.ParseMessageReport(log, store.FileMsgReader(d.m.MsgPrefix, d.dataFile)); err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("parsing dmarc aggregate report", err)
|
|
} else if d, err := dns.ParseDomain(report.PolicyPublished.Domain); err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("parsing domain in dmarc aggregate report", err)
|
|
} else if _, ok := mox.Conf.Domain(d); !ok {
|
|
log.Info("dmarc aggregate report for domain not configured, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d))
|
|
} else if report.ReportMetadata.DateRange.End > time.Now().Unix()+60 {
|
|
log.Info("dmarc aggregate report with end date in the future, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d), mlog.Field("end", time.Unix(report.ReportMetadata.DateRange.End, 0)))
|
|
} else {
|
|
dmarcReport = report
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Similar to DMARC reporting, we check for the required DKIM. We'll check
|
|
// reputation, defaulting to accept.
|
|
var tlsReport *tlsrpt.Report
|
|
if d.rcptAcc.destination.HostTLSReports || d.rcptAcc.destination.DomainTLSReports {
|
|
// Valid DKIM signature for domain must be present. We take "valid" to assume
|
|
// "passing", not "syntactically valid". We also check for "tlsrpt" as service.
|
|
// This check is optional, but if anyone goes through the trouble to explicitly
|
|
// list allowed services, they would be surprised to see them ignored.
|
|
// ../rfc/8460:320
|
|
ok := false
|
|
for _, r := range d.dkimResults {
|
|
// The record should have an allowed service "tlsrpt". The RFC mentions it as if
|
|
// the service must be specified explicitly, but the default allowed services for a
|
|
// DKIM record are "*", which includes "tlsrpt". Unless a the DKIM record
|
|
// explicitly specifies services (e.g. s=email), a record will work for TLS
|
|
// reports. The DKIM records seen used for TLS reporting in the wild don't
|
|
// explicitly set "s" for services.
|
|
// ../rfc/8460:326
|
|
if r.Status == dkim.StatusPass && r.Sig.Domain == d.msgFrom.Domain && r.Sig.Length < 0 && r.Record.ServiceAllowed("tlsrpt") {
|
|
ok = true
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
log.Info("received mail to tlsrpt without acceptable DKIM signature, not processing as tls report")
|
|
} else if report, err := tlsrpt.ParseMessage(log, store.FileMsgReader(d.m.MsgPrefix, d.dataFile)); err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("parsing tls report", err)
|
|
} else {
|
|
var known bool
|
|
for _, p := range report.Policies {
|
|
log.Info("tlsrpt policy domain", mlog.Field("domain", p.Policy.Domain))
|
|
if d, err := dns.ParseDomain(p.Policy.Domain); err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("parsing domain in tls report", err)
|
|
} else if _, ok := mox.Conf.Domain(d); ok {
|
|
known = true
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !known {
|
|
log.Info("tls report without one of configured domains, ignoring")
|
|
} else {
|
|
tlsReport = report
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Determine if message is acceptable based on DMARC domain, DKIM identities, or
|
|
// host-based reputation.
|
|
var isjunk *bool
|
|
var conclusive bool
|
|
var method reputationMethod
|
|
var reason string
|
|
var err error
|
|
d.acc.WithRLock(func() {
|
|
err = d.acc.DB.Read(ctx, func(tx *bstore.Tx) error {
|
|
if err := assignMailbox(tx); err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
isjunk, conclusive, method, err = reputation(tx, log, d.m)
|
|
reason = string(method)
|
|
return err
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("determining reputation", err, mlog.Field("message", d.m))
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, reasonReputationError)
|
|
}
|
|
log.Info("reputation analyzed", mlog.Field("conclusive", conclusive), mlog.Field("isjunk", isjunk), mlog.Field("method", string(method)))
|
|
if conclusive {
|
|
if !*isjunk {
|
|
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reason, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, string(method))
|
|
} else if dmarcReport != nil || tlsReport != nil {
|
|
log.Info("accepting message with dmarc aggregate report or tls report without reputation")
|
|
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reasonReporting, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
// If there was no previous message from sender or its domain, and we have an SPF
|
|
// (soft)fail, reject the message.
|
|
switch method {
|
|
case methodDKIMSPF, methodIP1, methodIP2, methodIP3, methodNone:
|
|
switch d.m.MailFromValidation {
|
|
case store.ValidationFail, store.ValidationSoftfail:
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", nil, reasonSPFPolicy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Senders without reputation and without iprev pass, are likely spam.
|
|
var suspiciousIPrevFail bool
|
|
switch method {
|
|
case methodDKIMSPF, methodIP1, methodIP2, methodIP3, methodNone:
|
|
suspiciousIPrevFail = d.iprevStatus != iprev.StatusPass
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With already a mild junk signal, an iprev fail on top is enough to reject.
|
|
if suspiciousIPrevFail && isjunk != nil && *isjunk {
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", nil, reasonIPrev)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var subjectpassKey string
|
|
conf, _ := d.acc.Conf()
|
|
if conf.SubjectPass.Period > 0 {
|
|
subjectpassKey, err = d.acc.Subjectpass(d.rcptAcc.canonicalAddress)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Errorx("get key for verifying subject token", err)
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, reasonSubjectpassError)
|
|
}
|
|
err = subjectpass.Verify(log, d.dataFile, []byte(subjectpassKey), conf.SubjectPass.Period)
|
|
pass := err == nil
|
|
log.Infox("pass by subject token", err, mlog.Field("pass", pass))
|
|
if pass {
|
|
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonSubjectpass, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reason = reasonNoBadSignals
|
|
accept := true
|
|
var junkSubjectpass bool
|
|
f, jf, err := d.acc.OpenJunkFilter(ctx, log)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
defer func() {
|
|
err := f.Close()
|
|
log.Check(err, "closing junkfilter")
|
|
}()
|
|
contentProb, _, _, _, err := f.ClassifyMessageReader(ctx, store.FileMsgReader(d.m.MsgPrefix, d.dataFile), d.m.Size)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Errorx("testing for spam", err)
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, reasonJunkClassifyError)
|
|
}
|
|
// todo: if isjunk is not nil (i.e. there was inconclusive reputation), use it in the probability calculation. give reputation a score of 0.25 or .75 perhaps?
|
|
// todo: if there aren't enough historic messages, we should just let messages in.
|
|
// todo: we could require nham and nspam to be above a certain number when there were plenty of words in the message, and in the database. can indicate a spammer is misspelling words. however, it can also mean a message in a different language/script...
|
|
|
|
// If we don't accept, we may still respond with a "subjectpass" hint below.
|
|
// We add some jitter to the threshold we use. So we don't act as too easy an
|
|
// oracle for words that are a strong indicator of haminess.
|
|
// todo: we should rate-limit uses of the junkfilter.
|
|
jitter := (jitterRand.Float64() - 0.5) / 10
|
|
threshold := jf.Threshold + jitter
|
|
|
|
// With an iprev fail, we set a higher bar for content.
|
|
reason = reasonJunkContent
|
|
if suspiciousIPrevFail && threshold > 0.25 {
|
|
threshold = 0.25
|
|
log.Info("setting junk threshold due to iprev fail", mlog.Field("threshold", 0.25))
|
|
reason = reasonJunkContentStrict
|
|
}
|
|
accept = contentProb <= threshold
|
|
junkSubjectpass = contentProb < threshold-0.2
|
|
log.Info("content analyzed", mlog.Field("accept", accept), mlog.Field("contentprob", contentProb), mlog.Field("subjectpass", junkSubjectpass))
|
|
} else if err != store.ErrNoJunkFilter {
|
|
log.Errorx("open junkfilter", err)
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, reasonJunkFilterError)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If content looks good, we'll still look at DNS block lists for a reason to
|
|
// reject. We normally won't get here if we've communicated with this sender
|
|
// before.
|
|
var dnsblocklisted bool
|
|
if accept {
|
|
blocked := func(zone dns.Domain) bool {
|
|
dnsblctx, dnsblcancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, 30*time.Second)
|
|
defer dnsblcancel()
|
|
if !checkDNSBLHealth(dnsblctx, resolver, zone) {
|
|
log.Info("dnsbl not healthy, skipping", mlog.Field("zone", zone))
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
status, expl, err := dnsbl.Lookup(dnsblctx, resolver, zone, net.ParseIP(d.m.RemoteIP))
|
|
dnsblcancel()
|
|
if status == dnsbl.StatusFail {
|
|
log.Info("rejecting due to listing in dnsbl", mlog.Field("zone", zone), mlog.Field("explanation", expl))
|
|
return true
|
|
} else if err != nil {
|
|
log.Infox("dnsbl lookup", err, mlog.Field("zone", zone), mlog.Field("status", status))
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Note: We don't check in parallel, we are in no hurry to accept possible spam.
|
|
for _, zone := range d.dnsBLs {
|
|
if blocked(zone) {
|
|
accept = false
|
|
dnsblocklisted = true
|
|
reason = reasonDNSBlocklisted
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if accept {
|
|
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonNoBadSignals, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if subjectpassKey != "" && d.dmarcResult.Status == dmarc.StatusPass && method == methodNone && (dnsblocklisted || junkSubjectpass) {
|
|
log.Info("permanent reject with subjectpass hint of moderately spammy email without reputation")
|
|
pass := subjectpass.Generate(d.msgFrom, []byte(subjectpassKey), time.Now())
|
|
return reject(smtp.C550MailboxUnavail, smtp.SePol7DeliveryUnauth1, subjectpass.Explanation+pass, nil, reasonGiveSubjectpass)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", nil, reason)
|
|
}
|