these could cause the parser to reject correct commands.
the first bug is about the allowed chars for an "atom", we were accepting too
many. this probably isn't easily triggered in practice.
the second bug is about how numbers (digits) are parsed. when gathering digits
to parse as number, we didn't consider only the directly upcoming digits that
make up the number, but continued looking for digits later on in the command.
then we tried to parse a string that was too long as a number, which would fail
because of additional characters. this could have been triggered with commands
containing two numbers. this is possible with e.g. "tag search or larger 123
smaller 123", the "or" takes two search keys again, each with a number. not too
common, but can happen.
found while writing tests for upcoming condstore/qresync implementation.
the mailbox select/examine responses now return all flags used in a mailbox in
the FLAGS response. and indicate in the PERMANENTFLAGS response that clients
can set new keywords. we store these values on the new Message.Keywords field.
system/well-known flags are still in Message.Flags, so we're recognizing those
and handling them separately.
the imap store command handles the new flags. as does the append command, and
the search command.
we store keywords in a mailbox when a message in that mailbox gets the keyword.
we don't automatically remove the keywords from a mailbox. there is currently
no way at all to remove a keyword from a mailbox.
the import commands now handle non-system/well-known keywords too, when
importing from mbox/maildir.
jmap requires keyword support, so best to get it out of the way now.
this is quite common on the internet. the other side may be trying some other
protocol, e.g. http, or some common vulnerability. we don't want to spam our
own logs with multiple invalid lines. if the first command is valid, but later
are not, we'll keep trying to process them. so this only affects protocol
sessions that are very likely not smtp/imap.
also remove a few more sleeps during tests, making imapserver and smtpserver tests a bit faster.
similar to greylisting, but not quite the same: with greylisting you would
always reject the first delivery attempt with a temporary failure. with the
hope that spammers won't retry their deliveries. the spams i've been receiving
seem to be quite consistent though. and we would keep rejecting them anyway.
we slow down the spammy connections to waste some of the resources of a
spammer. this may slow their campaigns down a bit, leaving a bit more time to
take measures.
we do the same with connections that have their 3rd authentication failure,
typically password guess attempts.
when we accept a message by a first-time sender, we sleep for 15 seconds before
actually delivering them. known-good senders don't have to wait. if the message
turns out to be a spammer, at least we've consumed one of their connections,
and they cannot deliver at too high a rate to us because of the max open
connection limit.
limiting is done based on remote ip's, with 3 ip mask variants to limit networks
of machines. often with two windows, enabling short bursts of activity, but not
sustained high activity. currently only for imap and smtp, not yet http.
limits are currently based on:
- number of open connections
- connection rate
- limits after authentication failures. too many failures, and new connections will be dropped.
- rate of delivery in total number of messages
- rate of delivery in total size of messages
the limits on connections and authentication failures are in-memory. the limits
on delivery of messages are based on stored messages.
the limits themselves are not yet configurable, let's use this first.
in the future, we may also want to have stricter limits for senders without any
reputation.
