mirror of
https://github.com/mjl-/mox.git
synced 2024-12-26 16:33:47 +03:00
improvements to outgoing dmarc reports and displaying evaluations
- more eagerly report about overrides, so domain owners can better tell that switching from p=none to p=reject will not cause trouble for these messages. - report multiple reasons, e.g. mailing list and sampled out - in dmarc analysis for rejects from first-time senders (possibly spammers), fix the conditional check on nonjunk messages. - in evaluations view in admin, show unaligned spf pass in yellow too and a few more small tweaks.
This commit is contained in:
parent
79e522887e
commit
481a25f294
2 changed files with 19 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -2411,24 +2411,26 @@ func (c *conn) deliver(ctx context.Context, recvHdrFor func(string) string, msgW
|
|||
|
||||
// Any DMARC result override is stored in the evaluation for outgoing DMARC
|
||||
// aggregate reports, and added to the Authentication-Results message header.
|
||||
var dmarcOverride string
|
||||
if dmarcResult.Record != nil {
|
||||
if !dmarcUse {
|
||||
dmarcOverride = string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideSampledOut)
|
||||
} else if a.dmarcOverrideReason != "" && (a.accept && !m.IsReject) == dmarcResult.Reject {
|
||||
dmarcOverride = a.dmarcOverrideReason
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We want to tell the sender that we have an override, e.g. for mailing lists, so
|
||||
// they don't overestimate the potential damage of switching from p=none to
|
||||
// p=reject.
|
||||
var dmarcOverrides []string
|
||||
if a.dmarcOverrideReason != "" {
|
||||
dmarcOverrides = []string{a.dmarcOverrideReason}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if dmarcResult.Record != nil && !dmarcUse {
|
||||
dmarcOverrides = append(dmarcOverrides, string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideSampledOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add per-recipient DMARC method to Authentication-Results. Each account can have
|
||||
// their own override rules, e.g. based on configured mailing lists/forwards.
|
||||
// ../rfc/7489:1486
|
||||
rcptDMARCMethod := dmarcMethod
|
||||
if dmarcOverride != "" {
|
||||
if len(dmarcOverrides) > 0 {
|
||||
if rcptDMARCMethod.Comment != "" {
|
||||
rcptDMARCMethod.Comment += ", "
|
||||
}
|
||||
rcptDMARCMethod.Comment += "override " + dmarcOverride
|
||||
rcptDMARCMethod.Comment += "override " + strings.Join(dmarcOverrides, ",")
|
||||
}
|
||||
rcptAuthResults := authResults
|
||||
rcptAuthResults.Methods = append([]message.AuthMethod{}, authResults.Methods...)
|
||||
|
@ -2477,7 +2479,7 @@ func (c *conn) deliver(ctx context.Context, recvHdrFor func(string) string, msgW
|
|||
// See if we received a non-junk message from this organizational domain.
|
||||
q := bstore.QueryTx[store.Message](tx)
|
||||
q.FilterNonzero(store.Message{MsgFromOrgDomain: m.MsgFromOrgDomain})
|
||||
q.FilterEqual("Notjunk", false)
|
||||
q.FilterEqual("Notjunk", true)
|
||||
exists, err := q.Exists()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("querying for non-junk message from organizational domain: %v", err)
|
||||
|
@ -2544,10 +2546,9 @@ func (c *conn) deliver(ctx context.Context, recvHdrFor func(string) string, msgW
|
|||
HeaderFrom: msgFrom.Domain.Name(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if dmarcOverride != "" {
|
||||
eval.OverrideReasons = []dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideReason{
|
||||
{Type: dmarcrpt.PolicyOverride(dmarcOverride)},
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, s := range dmarcOverrides {
|
||||
reason := dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideReason{Type: dmarcrpt.PolicyOverride(s)}
|
||||
eval.OverrideReasons = append(eval.OverrideReasons, reason)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We'll include all signatures for the organizational domain, even if they weren't
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ const dmarcEvaluationsDomain = async (domain) => {
|
|||
|
||||
const authStatus = (v) => inlineBox(v ? '' : yellow, v ? 'pass' : 'fail')
|
||||
const formatDKIMResults = (results) => results.map(r => dom.div('selector '+r.Selector+(r.Domain !== domain ? ', domain '+r.Domain : '') + ': ', inlineBox(r.Result === "pass" ? '' : yellow, r.Result)))
|
||||
const formatSPFResults = (results) => results.map(r => dom.div(''+r.Scope+(r.Domain !== domain ? ', domain '+r.Domain : '') + ': ', inlineBox(r.Result === "pass" ? '' : yellow, r.Result)))
|
||||
const formatSPFResults = (alignedpass, results) => results.map(r => dom.div(''+r.Scope+(r.Domain !== domain ? ', domain '+r.Domain : '') + ': ', inlineBox(r.Result === "pass" && alignedpass ? '' : yellow, r.Result)))
|
||||
|
||||
const sourceIP = (ip) => {
|
||||
const r = dom.span(ip, attr({title: 'Click to do a reverse lookup of the IP.'}), style({cursor: 'pointer'}), async function click(e) {
|
||||
|
@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ const dmarcEvaluationsDomain = async (domain) => {
|
|||
dom.th('Policy', attr({title: 'Summary of the policy as encountered in the DMARC DNS record of the domain, and used for evaluation.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('IP', attr({title: 'IP address of delivery attempt that was evaluated, relevant for SPF.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('Disposition', attr({title: 'Our decision to accept/reject this message. It may be different than requested by the published policy. For example, when overriding due to delivery from a mailing list or forwarded address.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('DKIM/SPF', attr({title: 'Whether DKIM and SPF had an aligned pass, where strict/relaxed alignment means whether the domain of an SPF pass and DKIM pass matches the exact domain (strict) or optionally a subdomain (relaxed). A DMARC pass requires at least one pass.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('Aligned DKIM/SPF', attr({title: 'Whether DKIM and SPF had an aligned pass, where strict/relaxed alignment means whether the domain of an SPF pass and DKIM pass matches the exact domain (strict) or optionally a subdomain (relaxed). A DMARC pass requires at least one pass.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('Envelope to', attr({title: 'Domain used in SMTP RCPT TO during delivery.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('Envelope from', attr({title: 'Domain used in SMTP MAIL FROM during delivery.'})),
|
||||
dom.th('Message from', attr({title: 'Domain in "From" message header.'})),
|
||||
|
@ -1228,13 +1228,13 @@ const dmarcEvaluationsDomain = async (domain) => {
|
|||
dom.td(addresses),
|
||||
dom.td(policy),
|
||||
dom.td(sourceIP(e.SourceIP)),
|
||||
dom.td(inlineBox(e.Disposition === 'none' ? '' : 'red', e.Disposition), (e.OverrideReasons || []).length > 0 ? ' ('+e.OverrideReasons.map(r => r.Type).join(', ')+')' : ''),
|
||||
dom.td(inlineBox(e.Disposition === 'none' ? '' : red, e.Disposition), (e.OverrideReasons || []).length > 0 ? ' ('+e.OverrideReasons.map(r => r.Type).join(', ')+')' : ''),
|
||||
dom.td(authStatus(e.AlignedDKIMPass), '/', authStatus(e.AlignedSPFPass)),
|
||||
dom.td(e.EnvelopeTo),
|
||||
dom.td(e.EnvelopeFrom),
|
||||
dom.td(e.HeaderFrom),
|
||||
dom.td(formatDKIMResults(e.DKIMResults || [])),
|
||||
dom.td(formatSPFResults(e.SPFResults || [])),
|
||||
dom.td(formatSPFResults(e.AlignedSPFPass, e.SPFResults || [])),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}),
|
||||
evaluations.length === 0 ? dom.tr(dom.td(attr({colspan: '14'}), 'No evaluations.')) : [],
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue