serv/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-27 06:03:51 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 8

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review

Browse source 
If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.

The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.

Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.

The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.
This commit is contained in:
Earl Warren 2024-01-18 11:09:05 +00:00
parent b145764e86
commit 6a555996dc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 0579CB2928A78A00
3 changed files with 7 additions and 34 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
routers/api/v1/repo/pull_review.go
View file

@ -331,22 +331,14 @@ func CreatePullReviewComment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
line = opts.OldLineNum * -1
}
comment, err := pull_service.CreateCodeComment(ctx,
comment, err := pull_service.CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
ctx.Doer,
ctx.Repo.GitRepo,
pr.Issue.Repo,
pr.Issue,
line,
opts.Body,
opts.Path,
// as of e522e774cae2240279fc48c349fc513c9d3353ee
// isPending is not needed because review.ID is always available
// and does not need to be discovered implicitly
false,
line,
review.ID,
// as of e522e774cae2240279fc48c349fc513c9d3353ee
// latestCommitID is not needed because it is only used to
// create a new review in case it does not already exist
"",
)
if err != nil {
ctx.InternalServerError(err)

6
services/pull/review.go
View file

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
return nil, err
}
comment, err := createCodeComment(ctx,
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
doer,
issue.Repo,
issue,
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
}
}
comment, err := createCodeComment(ctx,
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
doer,
issue.Repo,
issue,
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
}
// createCodeComment creates a plain code comment at the specified line / path
func createCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, content, treePath string, line, reviewID int64) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
func CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, content, treePath string, line, reviewID int64) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
var commitID, patch string
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LoadPullRequest: %w", err)

21
tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go
View file

@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ func TestAPIPullReviewCreateDeleteComment(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Event_"+string(event), func(t *testing.T) {
path := "README.md"
var review api.PullReview
existingCommentBody := "existing comment body"
var reviewLine int64 = 1
// cleanup
@ -76,18 +75,11 @@ func TestAPIPullReviewCreateDeleteComment(t *testing.T) {
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: "body1",
Event: event,
Comments: []api.CreatePullReviewComment{
{
Path: path,
Body: existingCommentBody,
OldLineNum: reviewLine,
},
},
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
require.EqualValues(t, string(event), review.State)
require.EqualValues(t, 1, review.CodeCommentsCount)
require.EqualValues(t, 0, review.CodeCommentsCount)
}
{
@ -100,17 +92,6 @@ func TestAPIPullReviewCreateDeleteComment(t *testing.T) {
}
requireReviewCount(1)
{
req := NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/comments", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index, review.ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviewComments []*api.PullReviewComment
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewComments)
require.Len(t, reviewComments, 1)
assert.EqualValues(t, username, reviewComments[0].Poster.UserName)
assert.EqualValues(t, existingCommentBody, reviewComments[0].Body)
}
newCommentBody := "first new line"
var reviewComment api.PullReviewComment