forgejo/templates/repo/commits_list_small.tmpl

51 lines
2.1 KiB
Go HTML Template
Raw Normal View History

{{$index := 0}}
<div class="timeline-item commits-list">
{{range .comment.Commits}}
{{$tag := printf "%s-%d" $.comment.HashTag $index}}
Use a general Eval function for expressions in templates. (#23927) One of the proposals in #23328 This PR introduces a simple expression calculator (templates/eval/eval.go), it can do basic expression calculations. Many untested template helper functions like `Mul` `Add` can be replaced by this new approach. Then these `Add` / `Mul` / `percentage` / `Subtract` / `DiffStatsWidth` could all use this `Eval`. And it provides enhancements for Golang templates, and improves readability. Some examples: ---- * Before: `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}` * After: `{{Eval $glyph.Row "*" 12 "+" 12}}` ---- * Before: `{{if lt (Add $i 1) (len $.Topics)}}` * After: `{{if Eval $i "+" 1 "<" (len $.Topics)}}` ## FAQ ### Why not use an existing expression package? We need a highly customized expression engine: * do the calculation on the fly, without pre-compiling * deal with int/int64/float64 types, to make the result could be used in Golang template. * make the syntax could be used in the Golang template directly * do not introduce too much complex or strange syntax, we just need a simple calculator. * it needs to strictly follow Golang template's behavior, for example, Golang template treats all non-zero values as truth, but many 3rd packages don't do so. ### What's the benefit? * Developers don't need to add more `Add`/`Mul`/`Sub`-like functions, they were getting more and more. Now, only one `Eval` is enough for all cases. * The new code reads better than old `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`, the old one isn't familiar to most procedural programming developers (eg, the Golang expression syntax). * The `Eval` is fully covered by tests, many old `Add`/`Mul`-like functions were never tested. ### The performance? It doesn't use `reflect`, it doesn't need to parse or compile when used in Golang template, the performance is as fast as native Go template. ### Is it too complex? Could it be unstable? The expression calculator program is a common homework for computer science students, and it's widely used as a teaching and practicing purpose for developers. The algorithm is pretty well-known. The behavior can be clearly defined, it is stable.
2023-04-07 16:25:49 +03:00
{{$index = Eval $index "+" 1}}
<div class="singular-commit" id="{{$tag}}">
<span class="badge badge-commit">{{svg "octicon-git-commit"}}</span>
{{if .User}}
<a class="avatar" href="{{.User.HomeLink}}">{{ctx.AvatarUtils.Avatar .User}}</a>
{{else}}
{{ctx.AvatarUtils.AvatarByEmail .Author.Email .Author.Name}}
{{end}}
{{$commitLink:= printf "%s/commit/%s" $.comment.Issue.PullRequest.BaseRepo.Link (PathEscape .ID.String)}}
Replace 10 more gt- classes with tw- (#29945) Likely the biggest change of the tailwind refactors. Only thing of note is that `tw-flex-1` resolves to `flex: 1 1 0%` while our `gt-f1` was `flex: 1 1 0`, I don't think it will make any difference. Commands I've ran: ```sh perl -p -i -e 's#gt-vm#tw-align-middle#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fw#tw-flex-wrap#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-f1#tw-flex-1#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fc#tw-flex-col#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-sb#tw-justify-between#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-je#tw-justify-end#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-jc#tw-justify-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-ac#tw-content-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-df#tw-flex#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-dib#tw-inline-block#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit f88ad5424f381bf2a45fd863b551c5a72891bb68) Conflicts: templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_actions.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/release/list.tmpl templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue discard the proposed changes and prefer Forgejo. A followup commit will apply the same commands.
2024-03-22 16:45:10 +03:00
<span class="shabox tw-flex tw-content-center tw-float-right">
{{template "repo/commit_statuses" dict "Status" .Status "Statuses" .Statuses}}
{{$class := "ui sha label"}}
{{if .Signature}}
{{$class = (print $class " isSigned")}}
{{if .Verification.Verified}}
{{if eq .Verification.TrustStatus "trusted"}}
{{$class = (print $class " isVerified")}}
{{else if eq .Verification.TrustStatus "untrusted"}}
{{$class = (print $class " isVerifiedUntrusted")}}
{{else}}
{{$class = (print $class " isVerifiedUnmatched")}}
{{end}}
{{else if .Verification.Warning}}
{{$class = (print $class " isWarning")}}
{{end}}
{{end}}
<a href="{{$commitLink}}" rel="nofollow" class="gt-ml-3 {{$class}}">
<span class="shortsha">{{ShortSha .ID.String}}</span>
{{if .Signature}}
{{template "repo/shabox_badge" dict "root" $.root "verification" .Verification}}
{{end}}
</a>
</span>
<span class="gt-mono commit-summary {{if gt .ParentCount 1}} grey text{{end}}" title="{{.Summary}}">{{RenderCommitMessageLinkSubject $.root.Context .Message $commitLink ($.comment.Issue.PullRequest.BaseRepo.ComposeMetas ctx)}}</span>
{{if IsMultilineCommitMessage .Message}}
<button class="ui button js-toggle-commit-body ellipsis-button" aria-expanded="false">...</button>
{{end}}
{{if IsMultilineCommitMessage .Message}}
<pre class="commit-body gt-hidden">{{RenderCommitBody $.root.Context .Message ($.comment.Issue.PullRequest.BaseRepo.ComposeMetas ctx)}}</pre>
{{end}}
</div>
{{end}}
</div>