forgejo/routers/common/markup.go

105 lines
2.6 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2014 The Gogs Authors. All rights reserved.
// Copyright 2023 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package common
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"strings"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/markup"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/markup/markdown"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context"
"mvdan.cc/xurls/v2"
)
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
type Renderer struct {
Mode, Text, URLPrefix, FilePath, BranchPath string
IsWiki bool
}
// RenderMarkup renders markup text for the /markup and /markdown endpoints
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
func (re *Renderer) RenderMarkup(ctx *context.Base, repo *context.Repository) {
var markupType string
relativePath := ""
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
if len(re.Text) == 0 {
_, _ = ctx.Write([]byte(""))
return
}
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
switch re.Mode {
case "markdown":
// Raw markdown
if err := markdown.RenderRaw(&markup.RenderContext{
Ctx: ctx,
Links: markup.Links{
AbsolutePrefix: true,
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
Base: re.URLPrefix,
},
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
}, strings.NewReader(re.Text), ctx.Resp); err != nil {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, err.Error())
}
return
case "comment":
// Comment as markdown
markupType = markdown.MarkupName
case "gfm":
// Github Flavored Markdown as document
markupType = markdown.MarkupName
case "file":
// File as document based on file extension
markupType = ""
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
relativePath = re.FilePath
default:
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
ctx.Error(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, fmt.Sprintf("Unknown mode: %s", re.Mode))
return
}
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
if !strings.HasPrefix(setting.AppSubURL+"/", re.URLPrefix) {
// check if urlPrefix is already set to a URL
linkRegex, _ := xurls.StrictMatchingScheme("https?://")
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
m := linkRegex.FindStringIndex(re.URLPrefix)
if m == nil {
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
re.URLPrefix = util.URLJoin(setting.AppURL, re.URLPrefix)
}
}
meta := map[string]string{}
if repo != nil && repo.Repository != nil {
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
if re.Mode == "comment" {
meta = repo.Repository.ComposeMetas(ctx)
} else {
meta = repo.Repository.ComposeDocumentMetas(ctx)
}
}
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
if re.Mode != "comment" {
meta["mode"] = "document"
}
if err := markup.Render(&markup.RenderContext{
Ctx: ctx,
Links: markup.Links{
AbsolutePrefix: true,
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
Base: re.URLPrefix,
BranchPath: re.BranchPath,
},
Metas: meta,
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
IsWiki: re.IsWiki,
Type: markupType,
RelativePath: relativePath,
fix: Preview picture not visible on Markdown file (#5781) Extend API MarkupOptions to contain branch path. The `api.MarkupOptions{}` to have `BranchPath` which contains the current branch. The `RenderMarkup` function utilizes a struct since there are too many variables passed as arguments and that is not a good sign for readability. And `repo-editor.js` will contain a new form data which is `branch-path` which will then be utilized by `edit.tmpl` as `data-branch-path`. Closes: #4510 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5781 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Nirmal Kumar R <tildezero@gmail.com>
2024-11-23 18:00:18 +03:00
}, strings.NewReader(re.Text), ctx.Resp); err != nil {
if markup.IsErrUnsupportedRenderExtension(err) {
ctx.Error(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, err.Error())
} else {
ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, err.Error())
}
return
}
}